List of ISO 42001 mandatory documents

Unfortunately, ISO 42001 requires more documentation when compared to some other standards like ISO 27001 or ISO 9001. So if you don’t know where to start, this article will provide you with a breakdown of documents and records mapped with particular clauses and controls of the standard.

ISO 42001 requires more than 20 documents to be written, including the top-level AI Policy, AIMS Scope Document, AI Risk Management Methodology, Statement of Applicability, AI Risk Treatment Plan, and others.

The criteria for the list below on what must be documented was when a standard uses phrases like “shall retain documented information,” “shall be available as documented information,” or “shall be documented.”

ISO 42001 mandatory documents and records for the main clauses of the standard

In the table below, I analyzed which clauses from the main part of ISO 42001 (i.e., from clauses 4 to 10) must be documented.

What must be documented ISO 42001 clause Usually documented through
Scope of the AIMS Clause 4.3 AIMS Scope Document
AI policy Clause 5.2 AI Policy
Actions taken to identify and address AI risks and opportunities Clause 6.1.1 AI Risk Register; AI Risk Assessment & Treatment Report
AI risk assessment process Clause 6.1.2 AI Risk Management Methodology
AI risk treatment process Clause 6.1.3 AI Risk Management Methodology
Statement of applicability Clause 6.1.3 Statement of Applicability
AI risk treatment plan Clause 6.1.3 AI Risk Treatment Plan
Results of the AI system impact assessment Clause 6.1.4 AI System Impact Assessment Report
AI objectives Clause 6.2 AIMS Objectives
Evidence of competence Clause 7.2 CVs, training certificates, etc.
Results of the AI risk assessment Clause 8.2 AI Risk Register; AI Risk Assessment & Treatment Report
Results of the AI risk treatment Clause 8.3 AI Risk Register; AI Risk Assessment & Treatment Report
Results of the AI system impact assessment Clause 8.4 AI System Impact Assessment Report
Results of monitoring and measurement Clause 9.1 Various automatic reports and dashboards created by AI systems; Monitoring & Measurement Report
Internal audit program Clause 9.2 Internal Audit Program
Internal audit results Clause 9.2 Internal Audit Report
Results of management reviews Clause 9.3 Management Review Minutes
Evidence of nonconformities, actions taken, and results of corrective action Clause 10.2 Corrective Action Form

List of mandatory documents and records for ISO 42001 Annex A

Unlike other standards, such as ISO 27001, ISO 42001 requires all controls to be documented. Therefore, the table below lists all 38 controls, with suggested ways to document them. The idea here was to reduce the number of documents by covering several controls with a particular document.

Note: If a company excludes a particular control by marking it as not applicable in the Statement of Applicability, then the document does not need to be written for that control.

What must be documented ISO 42001 control Usually documented through
Policy for the design and development of AI systems Control A.2.2 AI Systems Design and Development Policy
Policy for the use of AI systems Control A.2.2 AI Systems Acceptable Use Policy
Other policies affected by AI systems Control A.2.3 AI Policy
Review AI policy at planned intervals Control A.2.4 AI Policy
Define roles and responsibilities Control A.3.2 AI Policy
Process to report concerns about AI systems Control A.3.3 AI Policy
Required resources Control A.4.2 AI Policy; Register of AI Resources
Utilized data resources Control A.4.3 Register of AI Resources
Utilized tooling resources Control A.4.4 Register of AI Resources
Utilized computing resources Control A.4.5 Register of AI Resources
Utilized human resources Control A.4.6 Register of AI Resources
Establish a process for AI system impact assessment Control A.5.2 AI System Impact Assessment Methodology
Document the results of AI system impact assessments Control A.5.3 AI System Impact Assessment Report
Potential impacts of AI systems on individuals Control A.5.4 AI System Impact Assessment Report
Potential societal impacts of AI systems Control A.5.5 AI System Impact Assessment Report
Objectives for responsible development of AI systems Control A.6.1.2 AI Systems Design and Development Policy
Processes for the design and development of AI systems Control A.6.1.3 AI Systems Design and Development Policy
Requirements for AI systems Control A.6.2.2 AI Systems Design and Development Policy; Functional Requirements for AI System
AI system design and development Control A.6.2.3 AI Systems Design and Development Policy
AI system verification and validation measures Control A.6.2.4 AI Systems Design and Development Policy
AI system deployment plan Control A.6.2.5 AI Systems Operating Procedures
Necessary elements for the ongoing operation of the AI system Control A.6.2.6 AI Systems Operating Procedures
AI system technical documentation Control A.6.2.7 AI Systems Operating Procedures
AI system event logs Control A.6.2.8 AI Systems Operating Procedures; various logs from AI systems
Data management processes for the development of AI systems Control A.7.2 AI Systems Data Management Policy
Details about the acquisition and selection of the data Control A.7.3 AI Systems Data Management Policy; Register of AI Resources
Requirements for data quality Control A.7.4 AI Systems Data Management Policy; Register of AI Resources
Process for recording the provenance of data Control A.7.5 AI Systems Data Management Policy
Criteria for selecting data preparations and data preparation methods to be used Control A.7.6 AI Systems Data Management Policy
Provide necessary information to users of the AI system Control A.8.2 Policy for Handling AI Suppliers and Customers
Provide capabilities for interested parties to report adverse impacts Control A.8.3 Policy for Handling AI Suppliers and Customers
Plan for communicating incidents to users Control A.8.4 Policy for Handling AI Suppliers and Customers
Obligations for reporting information towards interested parties Control A.8.5 Policy for Handling AI Suppliers and Customers
Processes for the responsible use of AI systems Control A.9.2 AI Systems Acceptable Use Policy
Objectives for responsible use of AI systems Control A.9.3 AI Systems Acceptable Use Policy
Ensure that the AI system is used according to its intended use Control A.9.4 AI Systems Acceptable Use Policy
Responsibilities within the AI system life cycle are allocated between the company and third parties Control A.10.2 Policy for Handling AI Suppliers and Customers
Ensure that usage of services and products from suppliers is aligned with responsible development and use of AI systems Control A.10.3 Policy for Handling AI Suppliers and Customers
Consider customer expectations and needs when developing and using AI systems Control A.10.4 Policy for Handling AI Suppliers and Customers

Non-mandatory documents

Here are a few documents that are not mandatory according to ISO 42001; however, they could still be useful:

  • Procedure for Document and Record Control (clause 7.5) — this is not directly related to AI governance; however, it is still very helpful to avoid any confusion with managing documents.
  • Procedure for Monitoring of AI Systems (clause 9.1) — this is useful to set clear rules and responsibilities for continuous monitoring and measurement.
  • Procedure for Internal Audit (clause 9.2) — this is also not directly related to AI governance; however, it’s also useful to set clear rules for the internal audit.
  • Procedure for Corrective Action (clause 10.2) — again, this document is not directly related to AI governance; however, it is useful for setting clear rules for nonconformities and corrective actions.
  • Various cybersecurity and privacy documents — they are not directly required by ISO 42001; however, this is where ISO 27001 and GDPR documents can be used.
Advisera Dejan Kosutic

Dejan Kosutic

CEO & Lead Expert for ISO 27001 and ISO 42001

Leading expert on cybersecurity and AI governance and the author of several books, articles, webinars, and courses. As a premier expert, Dejan founded Advisera to help small and medium businesses obtain the resources they need to become compliant with EU regulations and ISO standards. He believes that making complex frameworks easy to understand and simple to use creates a competitive advantage for Advisera's clients, and that AI technology is crucial for achieving this.

As an ISO 27001 and ISO 42001 expert, Dejan helps companies find the best path to compliance by eliminating overhead and adapting the implementation to their size and industry specifics.

Read more articles by Dejan Kosutic