{"id":4444,"date":"2015-02-03T19:57:03","date_gmt":"2015-02-03T19:57:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/multiacademstg.wpengine.com\/20000academy\/blog\/2015\/02\/03\/post-implementation-review-buzzword-or-mighty-tool\/"},"modified":"2025-06-13T15:34:25","modified_gmt":"2025-06-13T15:34:25","slug":"post-implementation-review-buzzword-or-mighty-tool","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/blog\/2015\/02\/03\/post-implementation-review-buzzword-or-mighty-tool\/","title":{"rendered":"Post Implementation Review \u2013 Buzzword, or mighty tool?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I remember this situation of one of my clients: change was implemented and the spotlight shifted to Incident Management (you guessed it \u2013 resolving incidents that arose as a consequence of the change). It\u2019s not that the change was uncontrolled; quite the contrary \u00ad\u2013 it was well prepared, managed, and finished just how it should be (but consequences, like incidents, used to happen, and even that is usually considered normal). What was missing was having all stakeholders (e.g., users, change implementation team, Service Level Manager, Change Manager, etc.) sit down together and review the implementation.<\/p>\n<p>Why? Or, better to say, for what reason would we add one more activity (IT has plenty of activities and responsibilities already)? I agree; it could be that everything went perfectly, all requirements were met, the team delivered effectively, etc. But, as I experienced so many times \u2013 everything can be done better, and mistakes don\u2019t have to be repeated.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"padding-top: 10px; padding-bottom: 10px;\">Usability\u2026 in case you missed it<\/h2>\n<p>Try to recall a situation when you finished something (e.g., fixing something at home). You might remember saying, \u201cIt\u2019s good, but next time I will do it this way.\u201d That was your Post Implementation Review (PIR), or \u201creview.\u201d PIR takes place after deployment of new release or change implementation. Every time? No. The Change policy or Release policy are excellent places to define what undergoes formal review, and how.<\/p>\n<p>If you are more knowledgeable with <a href=\"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/what-is-itil\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">ITIL<\/a>\u00a0framework, then I would expect questions like: \u201cBut there is a process called Change Evaluation \u2013 how is PIR different?\u201d The Change Evaluation process in ITIL is more formal and spans throughout the whole lifecycle of change. PIR takes place when something (change or release) is over and it is a part of the <a href=\"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/iso-20000-documentation-toolkit\/?rel=service-design-build-and-transition-processes&amp;doc=change-management-process\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Change Management process<\/a> (read this article to find out more about Change Management: <a href=\"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/blog\/2013\/04\/23\/elements-change-management-itil\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Elements of Change Management in ITIL<\/a>). For example, a significant change would be the subject of the Change Evaluation process. The change will not only be evaluated when finished, but most of the major milestones will be evaluated as well (e.g., before the build phase begins).<br \/>\n<div id=\"middle-banner\" class=\"banner-shortcode\"><\/div><script>loadMiddleBanner();<\/script><br \/>\n<div id=\"side-banner-trigger\" class=\"banner-shortcode\"><\/div><br \/>\nPIR takes place after change is finished and is used to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Ensure that <strong>agreed objectives are met<\/strong> \u2013 every change has targets to meet. After the change is implemented, objectives should be checked to determine whether they have been achieved.<\/li>\n<li>Confirm that the <strong>customer is satisfied with the changes<\/strong>, i.e., that customer expectations are met. Usually, customer expectations should be translated into change requirements (see previous bullet), but they may not always match up.<\/li>\n<li>Check <strong>behavior after the implementation<\/strong> \u2013 what happened to me is that change was affecting certain functionality. After the change implementation, that new functionality worked perfectly, as required, but some of the other (\u201cold\u201d) functionality was \u201ckilled.\u201d PIR should determine the effects of implemented change.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Some organizations, usually large ones, have a formal PIR process and responsibilities. On the other side, smaller organizations perform ad-hoc PIR right after the implementation. What\u2019s important is that PIR takes place and that it\u2019s not done pro-forma.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"padding-top: 10px; padding-bottom: 10px;\">Lessons learned<\/h2>\n<p>What if no PIR is done? I know organizations that never look back after the change or deployment. This means that if something was done incorrectly (or less than optimally), the same mistakes will be repeated again in future changes. And again, and again\u2026 There is no need for that. Changes are made, providing experience as well as a team or person responsible for change. The only thing that is missing is PIR. After all that struggle with change, any additional effort for PIR should be insignificant. But the effect of PIR \u2013 it\u2019s very significant.<\/p>\n<p>When I am planning PIR, there are two approaches I use as guidelines:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Official\/figure-based<\/strong> \u2013 comparison of results vs. requirements, number of <a href=\"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/iso-20000-documentation-toolkit\/?rel=resolution-and-fulfillment-processes&amp;doc=incident-record\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">incidents<\/a>\u00a0arising from change, number of users\u2019 complaints\/feedbacks. Numbers are written down, which are excellent input for analysis.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Productivity-oriented<\/strong> \u2013 what went wrong, what was good. Honesty and orientation to improvement are the tools here. Honesty excludes blame, which means that the goal of the PIR is to revise our own performance and correct things that were done improperly. On the other side are things that were done well \u2013 adapt them as best practice and use them in future changes.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4445\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/\/sites\/6\/2015\/07\/Inputs_for_PIR1.png\" alt=\"Inputs_for_PIR1.png\" width=\"320\" height=\"315\" srcset=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2015\/07\/Inputs_for_PIR1.png 320w, \/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2015\/07\/Inputs_for_PIR1-300x295.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 320px) 100vw, 320px\" \/><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><em>Figure: Inputs for PIR<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s how you set up a learning organization.<\/p>\n<p>One more thing could help you to establish PIR. When implementing a new release or change, Project Management is often used to manage the implementation. Some of the project management methodologies divide the project into stages and recommend doing the review as each stage is finished. Collect the information and use it in future projects.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"padding-top: 10px; padding-bottom: 10px;\">If you implement ISO 20000\u2026.<\/h2>\n<p>\u2026then I don\u2019t have to elaborate on the necessity of the PIR. Whether you find it useful or not, <a href=\"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/what-is-iso-20000\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">ISO 20000<\/a>\u00a0requires that you perform a review of changes for effectiveness, as well as analyze <a href=\"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/iso-20000-documentation-toolkit\/?rel=service-design-build-and-transition-processes&amp;doc=request-for-change-and-change-record\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">requests for change<\/a>\u00a0on a regular basis and detect trends \u2013 reactive and proactive improvement based on review. You have to document results and conclusions from the analysis as well as identified opportunities for improvement.<\/p>\n<p>My experience taught me that there is always something that can be done better, faster, cheaper. Whenever I performed a review with my eyes wide open \u2013 I saw results. PIR is the tool that provides the opportunity to establish improvement in a change or deployment process and to show that increasing efficiency and effectiveness is among primary concerns. The next change implementation or deployment will show if this is just a buzzword or the real intention.<\/p>\n<p><em>To implement ISO 20000 easily and efficiently, use our<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/iso-20000-documentation-toolkit\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ISO 20000 Documentation Toolkit<\/a> <em>that provides step-by-step guidance for full ISO 20000 compliance.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I remember this situation of one of my clients: change was implemented and the spotlight shifted to Incident Management (you guessed it \u2013 resolving incidents that arose as a consequence of the change). It\u2019s not that the change was uncontrolled; quite the contrary \u00ad\u2013 it was well prepared, managed, and finished just how it should &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":4445,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[351,416,366,344,417,414],"class_list":["post-4444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","tag-change-management","tag-incident","tag-iso-20000","tag-itil","tag-post-implementation-review","tag-release"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4444"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4444\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18447,"href":"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4444\/revisions\/18447"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4445"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.advisera.com\/20000academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}